美国伦理〈欲女春潮〉,肖雅婷单挑榜一引热议,硅基芯片科技革新,星空传媒xk8038在线,g52g我爱搞g52.ppt,桔子tv传媒,正品蓝最新发布地址,投资展望2024,69一区二三区优质精华液,国产一卡2卡三卡4卡95,亚洲w欧洲无码sss222

SQP驗(yàn)廠-風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理系統(tǒng)

Risk Management Systems  SQP驗(yàn)廠-風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理系統(tǒng)

      FUNDAMENTAL: The company shall have a product risk management plan, based on a risk assessment system which shall be systematic, comprehensive, thorough, fully implemented and maintained. Companies must be aware of and refer to; up to date legislation, product standards, codes of practice and developments in science or technology that may impact the risk concerning their products and packaging where these exist in the countries of intended sale.

      基礎(chǔ)：公司有一個(gè)產(chǎn)品的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理計(jì)劃，根據(jù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評估系統(tǒng)，將系統(tǒng)，全面，深入，全面實(shí)施和保持。公司必須認(rèn)識(shí)和參考目前的立法，產(chǎn)品標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，規(guī)范和科學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展有可能影響風(fēng)險(xiǎn)有關(guān)的產(chǎn)品和包裝這些存在于國家的預(yù)期銷售。

1、Legislative and Safety Requirements sqp驗(yàn)廠立法和安全要求
1.1   Is the company aware of relevant legislation, mandatory standards and industry/customer codes of practice applicable to the product in the countries of intended sale?
1.2   Does the company have a mean of validating information impacting product safety,quality and legality, where such information is provided by the customer or related party?
1.3   Does the company have a process in place for ensuring it is kept informed of changes to relevant legislation, standards etc?

2、Risk Assessment (Documentation) SQP驗(yàn)廠風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評估（文件）
2.1   Does the company establish a product risk assessment  for each product or a group of similar products, e.g., FMEA?
2.2   Does the product risk assessment address the following aspects which have an effect on product safety and legality?
   2.2.1   User types (e.g., new born, young children, vulnerable people i.e., elderly, disabilities)
   2.2.2   Product use (e.g., behaviour, durability, user awareness, information and advice)
2.3   Does the product risk assessment determine the following?
   2.3.1   Possible Hazard/Risk Identification (e.g., Chemical, Physical, Regulatory);
   2.3.2   Risk level for each identified hazard/risk (e.g., Severe, High, Moderate, Slight);
   2.3.3   Whether the risk is acceptable considering the probability or likelihood and the severity and potential consequences of the effects on consumer safety (e.g., Not Acceptable, Review & Approve, Acceptable)
2.4   Where manufacturing sites have no responsibility for product design, is the company provided with a validated copy of the product risk assessment?
2.5   Does the company conduct a process risk assessment  of hazards potentially introduced during the production, packaging or storage processes?
2.6   Does the process risk assessment take the following into account?
   2.6.1   manufacturing parameters such as pressure, time, temperature
   2.6.3   conditions of equipment, moulds, dies, machinery
   2.6.4   chemicals / materials used for equipment (e.g. lubricating oils and paints)
   2.6.5   calibration of equipment
   2.6.6   policies on foreign body contamination (e.g. needles, metal, glass and brittle plastics)
   2.6.7   policies on microbiological contamination (e.g. hygiene of toilet & canteen, pest control)
   2.6.8   personal protective equipment (including specific clothing and footwear)
2.7   Does the process risk assessment identify the following?
   2.7.1   A list of potential risk or hazards in the production process
   2.7.2   Control points to manage the identified risk to acceptable level
   2.7.3   Accept / reject limits defined for each control point
   2.7.4   Corrective action to be taken where a CCP is out of control
   2.7.5   Responsibility of Control Points
   2.7.6   Records of monitoring &  reviews
2.8   If the assessment resulted in unacceptable risk, does the company go back to product design process or customer for modification to achieve acceptable risk?

3、Verification of Risk Assessment SQP驗(yàn)廠風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評估的驗(yàn)證
3.1   Is the verification of risk assessment carried out prior to production?
3.2   Is the risk assessment carried out by competent personnel (internal or external)?
3.3   Is the risk assessment regularly reviewed, at least annually or when changes made to product design and materials and/or key manufacturing processes?
3.4   Where required by legislation, does the company document and verify the identity,qualifications and/or licence of the person providing the safety review or risk assessment?
3.5   Where required by legislation or when it is necessary to confirm its safety or legality,does the risk assessment include the testing results of a representative product?